Joining LoN (Not a merger!)

Hello, I am End Game, Leader of LoM uni 1, and the creator of the LoN (League of Nations), A group of alliance who band together as allies, its like a merger but with much more freedom, and your not bound to us either. I would like to invite you to join the League. Together we can work closely and learn some new things. Please PM in-game or on the board. My In-Game name is End Game, Board name is 099Jayson. ty for your time.

swit i think you should talk to him a lil bit about ti wehn you can
see how much of a choice we ahve or w/e when an alliance in it goes to war

i think i'm goin to do some research on this matter before a yes or no is....because we may do the same with td.iu in a way.......i have to check if yap contacted me first....so this is a maybe

Thank You for considering TD.IU switowski.

There is no need to choose between TD.IU and LoM.

if LoM has the ability to become a strong alliance then why not we all join forces.

after all the idea is the same as what we are talking discussing lately...

but just as you say, the name should be voted by all...

yes LoN you are welcome to join us..good thinking yap thats why i like you your a great thinker

uh...i got confused somewhere

alarg you just get confused easily....yap he wants us to join him in LoN or maybe be allies with LoN

ha oh ok
you can deal with that swit

swit dont forget you have to see what they have to offer you and your alliance if you do deside to merge. im not here with you guys and its your choice but think it through.

i really dont like the idea of joining alliances, thats wat allies are for, this league thing seems like a waste. no offense dude but being allies is the same thing

maybe but the idea of using only one forum together with the allies can increase the communication and coordination even in times of peace.

gamerpinoy89 wrote:

i really dont like the idea of joining alliances, thats wat allies are for, this league thing seems like a waste. no offense dude but being allies is the same thing

I agree with that.

you know, call me what you may, but there's too much hard work put in here to simply throw it all away now. and in my view, allies are useless and undesirable. sure they can cover your ass sometimes. but how many times will you have to go to war because of them too?

i say we should stick to signing naps. alliances are not such a good idea if youre looking for peace

that sounds like a good idea, but comunitcation is better when the uppers do it together then the members learn it from the them, but watev

Sorry I have been away, I don't usually go on other alliances forums unless I need to contact them. First off, in response to what is being said here. LoN has no wishes to join you guys, as I just created it, I do not wish to turn it into something else, at least not at this moment, I would like to see how far it goes. Perhaps you can join us tho? If not. Then I am unsure of what we can work out here. As I am President of the League, if our 2 super alliances were to become allies, I'd Have to discuss this with them first. So, what are we going to do here?

end game srry but me and yap have decided not to join you but thank you for your offer happy huntings

dardanian wrote:

gamerpinoy89 wrote:

i really dont like the idea of joining alliances, thats wat allies are for, this league thing seems like a waste. no offense dude but being allies is the same thing

I agree with that.

you know, call me what you may, but there's too much hard work put in here to simply throw it all away now. and in my view, allies are useless and undesirable. sure they can cover your ass sometimes. but how many times will you have to go to war because of them too?

i say we should stick to signing naps. alliances are not such a good idea if youre looking for peace

NAP is useless if you are going to have a NAP with a weaker alliance. it would only mean that you cannot farm them. they would be the only one benifiting from it. since even without a NAP they cannot attack a much stronger alliance or players.

your right yap totally

[quote="Yap"]

dardanian wrote:

NAP is useless if you are going to have a NAP with a weaker alliance. it would only mean that you cannot farm them. they would be the only one benifiting from it. since even without a NAP they cannot attack a much stronger alliance or players.

I didn't say I supported NAPS either, all I said is that they weren't nearly as bad as having allies. but at the end of they day, sure, both naps and allies suck